In Re Splash Technology Holdings Inc. Securities Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 4 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(b) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or (c) To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 274 F. Supp. 2d 163 - Scritchfield v. Paolo

2. “[S]tatements which used the words `healthy,' `strong,' or `increased awareness' constitute[ ] vague assessments of past results, on which no reasonable investor would rely.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Next Century Communications Corp. v. Ellis