Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

160 Ga. App. 898

Weaver v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 12, 1982

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1982-01-12

Relies on Anders v. California · Bethay v. State · 153 Ga. App. 35 - Baldwin v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1982-01-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2004

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

50198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

¶1Defendant was convicted of the offenses of nine counts of burglary and one count of criminal attempt to commit burglary. After the appeal was filed in this court defendant’s appointed counsel filed permission to withdraw from the case pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493), that is, that after a careful and conscientious examination of the record and proceedings counsel believes an appeal of this case to be wholly frivolous. Counsel has fully complied with the requirements of Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406). See also Hill v. State, 238 Ga. 564 (233 SE2d 796).

¶2After examination of the record and transcript we find the appeal is wholly frivolous. Counsel has been granted permission to withdraw. The defendant has been notified of this action and of his options by reason thereof. No other counsel has been appointed or employed and defendant has not raised any enumeration of error or valid ground for appeal prior to the rendition of this opinion.

¶3In compliance with the above cases, we have fully and carefully examined the record and transcript. We find no reversible error. A rational trier of fact (the jury in the case sub judice) could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at the trial proof of guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt of the offenses of nine counts of burglary and one count of criminal attempt to commit burglary. See Snell v. State, 246 Ga. 648 (272 SE2d 348); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528). See also Mason v. State, 157 Ga. App. 392 (278 SE2d 498).

¶4Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Pope, J., concur.
/160/gaapp/898 · .json · Public domain