160 Ill. App. 3d 1043 - People v. Shinkle’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · International Ass'n of Machinists v. Duckworth · 47 Ill. 2d 510 - The People v. Montgomery · 76 Ill. 2d 19 - People v. Baptist · 88 Ill. 2d 342 - People v. Gaines
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[u]ses an eavesdropping device to hear or record all or any part of any conversation unless he does so (1) with the consent of all of the parties to such conversation or (2) with the consent of any one party to such conversation and in accordance with Article 108A of the Code of Criminal Procedure ***.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par 14-2(a).)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.