Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 Ind. 176 - Alexander v. Spaulding

Alexander v. Spaulding’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
April 1984
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 1984 · most notably 152 Ind. App. 365 - Hunter v. Hunter (1972), Brown v. Brown (1956)

36 state decisions

170190319101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carmel Natural Gas & Improvement Co. v. Small · Wright v. Moody · Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Bodenschatz · Orth v. Orth · Ice v. Ball

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No fraud is charged from beginning to end, and no such a state of facts pleaded as calls for the interposition of a court of equity to prevent the failure of justice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.