160 Ind. App. 1 - State v. Jump’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 1981
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Summers v. State · Atkins v. State · State Ex Rel. Atkins v. JUVENILE CT. OF MARION CTY. · State Ex Rel. Hunter v. JUVENILE CT. OF MARION CTY.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ [Referee Richard V. Bennett] CONDUCTED a full investigation of the matter and now finds: 1. The child is (was) over fifteen (15) years of age and under eighteen (18) years of age to wit: 16 years, at the time of the charged offense. 2. The offense charged would be a crime if committed by an adult, to wit: ASSAULT AND BATTERY WITH INTENT TO KILL. 3. The matter has specific prosecutive merit if waived to a court of adult criminal jurisdiction. 4. That if the matter were to be retained in the juvenile jurisdiction and child adjudged to be delinquent, no disposition available to the Juvenile Court is reasonably calculated to effect rehabilitation in that: The offense charged is of heinous or aggravated nature, The offense charged is part of a repetitive pattern of juvenile offenses, to wit: J70-6389 12-6-70 FIRST DEGREE BURGLARY The best interests of the public welfare and the protection of public security require that said juvenile stand trial as an adult offender.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.