160 Ind. App. 338 - Hendley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
July 1980
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Spivey v. State · Jones v. State · 159 Ind. App. 59 - Bennett v. State · Johnson v. State · Hanes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To prove the offense of Assault and Battery with Intent to Rape, the intended act [rape] need not be shown to have been consummated, it needs only to be shown that there was conduct by the accused from which the court or jury could logically and reasonably infer the element of intent. This Court in Hanes v. State (1900), 155 Ind. 112, 116 , 57 N.E. 704, 705 , made the following statement on this point. ‘Intent is a mental function, and, where not consummated, it is impossible to know with absolute certainly what was operating in the actor’s mind ; and in such cases it must be arrived at by courts and juries from a consideration of the conduct in the natural and usual sequence to which such conduct logically and reasonably points. . . .’” 271 N.E.2d at 888-890.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Foncannon v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.