Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 Ind. App. 360 - Goode v. State

160 Ind. App. 360 - Goode v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
December 2002
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2002 · most notably Williams v. State (1975), 161 Ind. App. 443 - Branan v. State (1974)

33 state decisions

2101974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Brady v. United States · Santobello v. New York · Kleinrichert v. State · Brimhall v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘The basic mandate under the constitution of the United States as interpreted by the Supreme Court of the United States and under both the State and Federal Constitutions as interpreted in the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Indiana is that a trial court must determine that a plea of guilty is “knowingly, intelligently, voluntarily and willingly entered.” ’ Taylor v. State (1973), 156 Ind. App. 659 , 297 N.E.2d 896, 899 .” 312 N.E.2d at 111-112 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““THE COURT: . . . [Let] [t]he record show that the Court accepts the defendant’s plea, strike that. Now, Mr. Goode, have you had time to discuss this with your attorney, have you? MR. GOODE: Yes, I have, Your Honor. THE COURT: MR. GOODE: And he’s advised you of your constitutional rights, you could have a jury trial and all these things, if you wanted it? Yes, he has. THE COURT: Now if you plead guilty, you’re saying to me that you did strike Bronko Mijatovich by hitting and kicking him about the head and face, is that correct? MR. GOODE: Yes, Your Honor. THE COURT: Then you may be seated. Then let the record show that the Court accepts the defendant’s plea of guilty, . . .” 312 N.E. 2d at 111 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““It has been consistently held by this Court that a motion to correct errors is not the proper procedural method for challenging a plea of guilty. Pritchard v. State (1965), 246 Ind. 671 , 210 N.E.2d 372 ; Snow v. State (1963), 245 Ind. 423 , 195 N.E.2d 468 , 199 N.E.2d 468 [469], The proper method is the filing of a petition for postconviction relief under P.C. Rule 1. Lockhart v. State (1971), [257] Ind. [349], 274 N.E.2d 523 ; Grimes v. State (1972), [257] Ind. [660], 278 N.E.2d 271 .” See: Goode v. State (1974), 160 Ind. App. 360 , 312 N.E.2d 109 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.