160 Ind. App. 680 - Jackson v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 1977
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 134 Ind. App. 661 - Findling v. Findling · Winn v. O'NEAL, SHERIFF, ETC. · 134 Ind. App. 157 - McCracken v. HUNTER · Philips v. State · 154 Ind. App. 196 - Taylor v. Butt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The transcript of the proceedings at the trial, including all papers, objections and other matters referred to above shall be presented to the judge who presided at the trial, who-shall examine the same and if not true, correct thé same without delay, and as finally settled by the court, shall sign the same, certifying to the same as being true and correct in said proceedings, and-order-the same filed and made, a part of the record in the clerk’s..office,” (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““In reading these two rules together, we do not perceive that it was the intent of the Supreme Court to change the former practice, wherein after the trial judge settled the bill of exceptions and signed the Judge’s Certificate thereto, someone, usually the appellant’s attorney, had to take the bill of exceptions to the Clerk, have it filed and made a part of the record. If this was not done, and the questions sought to be raised on appeal required a consideration of the evidence for their resolution, the Supreme Court consistently held that if the evidence had not been made a part of the record, the reviewing court could not consider it and therefore nothing was presented on appeal.” (Our emphasis.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Courts speak only by their records, and an. appellate tribunal can only be informed from the record made up of entries by the- clerk and the bill of exceptions certified by the trial judge and duly filed with the clerk. Coney v. Farmers State Bank (1970), 146 Ind. App. 483 , 256 N.E. 2d 692 ; Findling v. Findling supra; Philips v, State (1930), 202 Ind. 181 , 172 N.E. 904 .” (Emphasis added.) 289 N.E. 2d at 161 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.