Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 Ind. App. 83 - Smith v. Young

160 Ind. App. 83 - Smith v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 1992
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 1992

16 state decisions

80197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. State of North Carolina · Ikerd v. Lapworth · Season-All Industries, Inc. v. Turkiye Sise Ve Cam Fabrikalari, A. S. · 148 Ind. App. 358 - Kniffen v. Courtney · Oppenheimer v. Morton Hotel Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It appears clear from the tenor of Ind. Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 56(C) that the party against whom a Motion for Summary Judgment is directed should have an opportunity to oppose such Motion. While it is not necessary in all cases that a formal hearing be scheduled and conducted, the opposing party should have at least the 10 day period specified in the rule, within which to file opposing affidavits, memoranda of law and the like. The trial court should then, upon filing of a Motion for Summary Judgment, set a date for hearing giving notice thereof or give notice to the opposing party that counter affidavits and other materials must be filed on or before a date certain. See Season-All Industries, Inc. v. Turkiye Sise Ve Cam Fabrikalari, A. S. (1970 C.A.3rd), 425 F.2d 34 .” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.