Farrow v. Farrow’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1955
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kremer v. Kremer · Metcalf v. Metcalf · Leiter v. Leiter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A party desiring to appeal from a judgment granting a divorce must, within ten days after such judgment, file in the office of the clerk of the district court a written notice stating that it is the intention of such party to appeal, and if such notice is filed the party filing the same may commence proceedings on appeal at any time within four months from the date of the decree appealed from.” (Syl. 1.) “The filing of a notice of intention to appeal is a condition precedent to the right of appeal.” (Syl. 2.) "A judgment for divorce and a judgment for alimony or for division of property rendered in connection therewith are so far separate and independent that notwithstanding the party desiring to appeal may be precluded from having a review of the judgment for divorce because of his failure to give timely notice of his intention to appeal, yet he may have a review of the alimony or property features under the general provisions of the code of civil procedure.” (Syl. 3.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lang v. Lang““Applying the principles of the above cases to the present case, it appears there was no timely filing of an intention to appeal, and we are therefore without jurisdiction to consider the divorce features of the judgment, which'might be involved in any consideration of the trial court’s ruling on the motion for a new trial. Had there been a timely notice of intention, there was no commencement of an appeal within four months from the date of the decree.” (pp. 31 and 32.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lang v. Lang
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.