In Re Steen’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2002
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on William Marbury v. James Madison · Ex parte Garland · Wall · Hayburn's case · People Ex Rel. Karlin v. Culkin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In [Ex parte Cashin, 128 Miss. 224 , 90 So. 850 (1922) ] this court has said that, in disbarment proceedings, the court must and will exercise the power to determine the method of procedure to be followed, affording all reasonable opportunity to be heard, and for a fair hearing, without oppression or injustice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Lewis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.