State v. McLaughlin’s Empirical Analysis
1901
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1938
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The second instruction for the State was erroneous in that it permitted the jury to find the defendant’s house was a bawdy-house because one or more women boarded with her and received men in her house for sexual intercourse and paid her a certain part of the money received, without requiring the State to show that defendant knew the said facts or was privy to the said conduct. Moreover, it was in direct conflict with instruction 3 for defendant, which announces the true rule of law in the premises.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Malloch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.