160 N.C. App. 549 - State v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Ricciardelli · 124 N.C. App. 565 - State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The anticipatory warrant must set out, on its face, explicit, clear, and narrowly drawn triggering events which must occur before execution may take place; (2) Those triggering events, from which probable cause arises, must be (a) ascertainable, and (b) preordained, meaning that the property is on a sure and irreversible course to its destination; and finally, (3) No search may occur unless and until the property does, in fact, arrive at that destination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Anticipatory search warrants are “issued in advance of the receipt of particular property at the premises designated in the warranty ” Issuance of an anticipatory warrant is “based on a showing of future probable cause to believe that an item will be at a specific location at a particular time in the near future.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.