Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 N.C. App. 693 - State v. Davis

160 N.C. App. 693 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 91 N.C. App. 707 - State v. Alston · 153 N.C. App. 716 - State v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The absence of the actual bills neither inhibited the jury, nor prejudiced defendant in this case. The jury got to see the whole picture by listening to the witnesses on each side. More importantly, through testimony, the jury considered the evidence that defendant claims would exonerate him and rejected it. Therefore, the failure to produce the actual money did not prejudice defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “present substantial evidence that defendant (i) had either actual orconstructive possession of the cocaine and (ii) possessed the cocaine with the intent to sell.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.