John v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably 50 Wis. 2d 540 - State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Cady (1971), Menechino v. Oswald (1970)
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gideon v. Wainwright · Carnley v. Cochran · Townsend v. Burke · Mempa v. Rhay
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1. “ * * * on January 29, 1973, Defendant Patrick Gronlie pleaded guilty to, and was convicted of, the crime of burglary in District Court of the Second Judicial District within and for the County of Pembina, State of North Dakota, and was sentenced to one year at the North Dakota State Farm located in Burleigh County, North Dakota; and that such Defendant presently is confined at this institution; “2. “ * * * on April 19, 1973, Defendant Dale Heck pleaded guilty to and was convicted of the crime of burglary, pleading guilty to eight separate counts thereof, in District Court of the Second Judicial District within and for the County of Cavalier, State of North Dakota ; and such Defendant, on count one, was sentenced to the North Dakota State Farm located in Burleigh County, North Dakota; that on the remaining seven counts, such Defendant was placed on probation under N.D.C.C. 12-53, Suspension of Imposition of Judgment, for four years, and all of such sentences were ordered to run concurrently; and such Defendant presently is confined at the. State Farm; “3. “ * * * on May 4, 1973, the Attorney General of the State of North Dakota issued an Opinion that the Parole Board of the State of North Dakota does not have parole jurisdiction over inmates of the State Farm; “4. “ * * * thereafter each of the Defendants, Patrick Gronlie and Dale Heck, made letter application to the sentencing Court for vacation of or modification of each such sentence to the State Farm; that each of the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gronlie““The right to counsel clause of Section 13 of the North Dakota Constitution refers' to ‘criminal prosecution’ and states that in such prosecution the party accused shall have the right to ‘appear and defend in person and with counsel’. A probation or parole revocation hearing (except where sentencing has been deferred) is not encompassed by the phrase ‘criminal prosecution’, and, therefore, the constitutional right to counsel under Section 13 does not apply.” John v. State, N.D., 160 N.W.2d 37 (1968).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Skidgell v. State“in its discretion, without notice [to] revoke and terminate such probation, pronounce judgment, and deliver defendant to the sheriff to be transferred to the penitentiary or other state institution in accordance with the sentence imposed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Decker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.