Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 Ohio App. 3d 1 - State v. Cremeans

160 Ohio App. 3d 1 - State v. Cremeans’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2022

12 state decisions

100200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Bell v. Wolfish · Pennsylvania v. Mimms · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. · United States v. Martinez-Fuerte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The test of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment is not capable of precise definition or mechanical application. In each case it requires a balancing of the need for the particular search against the invasion of personal rights that the search entails. Courts must consider the scope of the particular intrusion, the manner in which it is conducted, the justification for initiating it, and the place in which it is conducted.`”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “doctrine permits a search without a warrant or individualized suspicion when the primary purpose of the search transcends the ordinary ends of law enforcement, e.g., the search is not designed for gathering evidence towards the end of an imminent prosecution. Cremeans , supra. Alternatively, the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “preclude the possibility that [R.C. 2901.07 ] might survive scrutiny under the special-needs doctrine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.