Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 Ohio App. 3d 159 - In Re Slider

160 Ohio App. 3d 159 - In Re Slider’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

28 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stores Realty Co. v. City of Cleveland · In re Baby Girl Baxter · 123 Ohio App. 3d 448 - In Re Sappington · 119 Ohio App. 3d 201 - In Re Howard · 77 Ohio App. 3d 80 - In Re Adoption of Howell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “{¶ 14} “The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to protect the interest of a child in any proceeding concerning an alleged or adjudicated delinquent child or unruly child when either of the following applies: {¶ 15} “(1) The child has no parent, guardian, or legal custodian. {¶ 16} “(2) The court finds that there is a conflict between the child and the child’s parent, guardian, or legal custodian.” {¶ 17} Likewise Juv.R. 4(B) states: {¶ 18} “The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to protect the interests of a child or incompetent adult in a juvenile court proceeding when: {¶ 19} “ * * * {¶20} “(2) The interests of the child and the interests of the parent may conflict.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “should be more sensitive to potential conflicts of interest under Juv.R. 4(B)(2) when there is no other person present to protect the rights and interests of the minor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(2) The court finds that there is a conflict of interest between the child and the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.