160 Ohio App. 3d 439 - In Re Neill’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “right of a vehicle * * * to proceed uninterruptedly in a lawful manner in the direction in which it * * * is moving in preference to another vehicle * * * approaching from a different direction into its * * * path.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Cornish · Columbus v. Gunthorp

2. “'evidence of speed in excess of a posted speed limit alone is not conclusive that a vehicle is proceeding unlawfully and has forfeited its right of way.'”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Columbus v. Gunthorp · State v. Cline

3. “[T]he state is not required to prove lawful operation as an element of proving a failure to -3- Butler CA2014-02-054 yield the right-of-way, as the law presumes that a vehicle that is claimed to have the right-of- way is proceeding lawfully.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Cornish