160 Ohio App. 3d 46 - State v. Lett’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Hand (2006), 161 Ohio App. 3d 274 - State v. Lett (2005)
66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · Tibbs v. Florida · State v. Johnson · State v. Coleman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'participation in criminal intent may be inferred from the presence, companionship, and conduct before and after the offense is committed.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“To support a conviction for complicity by aiding and abetting pursuant to R.C. 2923.03 (A)(2), the evidence must show that the defendant supported, assisted, encouraged, cooperated with, advised, or incited the principal in the commission of the crime, and that the defendant shared the criminal intent of the principal. Such intent may be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the crime.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he mere presence of an accused at the scene of a crime is not sufficient[,]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.