State v. Byrd’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably State v. Wright (2005), 171 Ohio App. 3d 225 - State v. Mitchell (2007)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Blakemore v. Blakemore · Ohio v. Roberts · Horton v. Allen · 3 Misc. 3d 739 - People v. Moscat
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“hearsay unless the declarant is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the declarant. While a comprehensive definition of”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“under Evid.R. 803(2), the availability of the declarant is immaterial. Thus, it was of no consequence that the state did not call the female witness to testify and face cross-examination from the accused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.