Hanson v. Schrick’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 1994
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Saratoga Inv. Co. v. Kern · Eichhorn v. Lundin · Kellogg v. Ford · Service v. Sumpter Valley Ry. Co. · State v. Huffman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"it is error for the trial court to select a single part of the evidence and instruct the jury as to its probative value: Dunn v. First National Bank, 149 Or. 97 ( 39 P. (2d) 944 ); Service v. Sumpter Valley Ry. Co., 88 Or. 554 ( 171 P. 202 ); State v. Ausplund, 86 Or. 121 ( 167 P. 1019 ); Saratoga Inv. Co. v. Kern, 76 Or. 243 ( 148 P. 1125 ); Kellogg v. Ford, 70 Or. 213 ( 139 P. 751 ); State v. Huffman, 16 Or. 15 ( 16 P. 640 )." Hanson v. Schrick 160 Or. 397, 403 , 85 P.2d 355 (1939).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.