160 Or. App. 182 - State v. Sanchez’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Mayans · United States of America Ex Rel. Rogelio Nieves Negron v. The State of New York · State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. Sawyer · Black v. State · Stelts v. State of Oregon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"His argument does not come within the scope of our review. Under ORS 183.222(4)(a), in any appeal we may review a claim that the sentencing court failed to comply with the sentencing requirements. However, that subsection is subject to the general provision that a sentence may be reviewed under the provisions of ORS 138.222. ORS 138.222(1). Defendant's argument challenges the vacation of the original sentence, not the sentence." 116 Or. App. at 606 , 843 P.2d 459 . (Emphasis in original.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the sentence itself, not procedures that lead to the actual imposition of the sentence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“failed to comply with requirements of law in imposing * * * a sentence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.