160 Pa. Super. 129 - Holbrook v. Holbrook’s Empirical Analysis
1946
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McKrell v. McKrell · 119 Pa. Super. 300 - Sleight v. Sleight · 106 Pa. Super. 33 - Rufus L. Sharp v. E. Sharp · 158 Pa. Super. 384 - Othmer v. Othmer · 136 Pa. Super. 266 - Hewitt v. Hewitt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the findings of fact and conclusions of the trial judge, who heard the testimony and saw the witnesses, are entitled to careful consideration on appeal and will not be lightly disturbed”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Phipps v. Phipps“Testimony as to respondent's conduct after the parties' separation is relevant for the purpose of shedding light upon respondent's behavior prior to the separation”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Phipps v. Phipps
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.