Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 SW 714 - Graham v. State

Graham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 1987
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1987

6 state decisions

2019131920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 44 Tex. Crim. 382 - Holden v. State · 53 Tex. Crim. 187 - Leonard v. State · Lunn v. State · 41 Tex. Crim. 644 - Hamilton v. State · 44 Tex. Crim. 471 - McFadin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the qualification to one of the bills (of exception) the court states a lot of facts, or what purports to be facts, that are dehors the record, and about which he was not authorized to qualify the bills of exception, because they were independent statements, and if these were facts, and were thought necessary to be stated in the connection in which they are used, he would have to testify like any other witness upon the controverted points.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.