Brazell v. Gault’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1994
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Austin v. Austin City Cemetery Ass'n · Hawks v. Yancey · Dibrell v. City of Coleman · Ehlert v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. · Reed v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[G]enerally, courts of equity deal only with civil and property rights ... and an injunction will not be granted to restrain officers from ... the prosecution of crime. It is only in rare instances, where it is evident that no adequate legal remedy exists, that the rule will be extended.”) (emphasis added); Roberts v. Gossett, 88 S.W.2d 507, 510 (Tex.Civ.App.-Amarillo 1935, no writ) (discussing the property requirement and stating that it is but”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.