Wheat v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 272nd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Montgomery v. State · Moses v. State · Landon v. Jean-Paul Budinger, Inc. · Barfield v. State · Ricondo v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Having sustained ground two, we need not ... perform a harm analysis for the errors admitted by the State in issues one and five. We reverse the three convictions, sever [the sexual assault count from indecency with a child counts] and remand the cause for a new trial on [the sexual assault count] and a new punishment hearing on the guilty pleas to [the indecency with a child counts].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wheat v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.