Ex Parte Coffee’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
78 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably 863 So. 2d 836 - Byrom v. State (2003), State Ex Rel. Latty v. Owens (1995)
78 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Southwest Weather Research, Inc. v. Jones · Freeman v. Freeman · Brown v. Gulf Television Co. · Riggins v. Thompson · Lancaster v. Lancaster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), a writ of injunction against a party who is a resident of this state shall be tried in a district or county court in the county in which the party is domiciled. If the writ is granted against more than one party, it may be tried in the proper court of the county in which either party is domiciled. (b) A writ of injunction granted to stay proceedings in a suit or execution on a judgment must be tried in the court in which the suit is pending or the judgment was rendered.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““In granting a writ of temporary injunction upon expiration of the restraining order, the trial court should have required a new bond with new contractual obligations, but we know of no reason why, with the signers of a restraining order bond before it and agreeing, the court could not extend the bond and the second obligation of its signers to comply with Rule 684. There is nothing in the record before us to show that that did not occur. In support of the validity of the court’s order and the writ we will presume it did occur.” ( 328 S.W.2d at p. 292 , emphasis ours)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jernigan v. Jernigan““It is settled that Art. 4656 only applies to and governs the issuance and return of writs and trial in cases in which the relief sought is purely or primarily in-junctive. Southwest Weather Research, Inc. v. Jones, 160 Tex. 104 , 327 S.W.2d 417 ; Brown v. Gulf Television Co., 157 Tex. 607 , 306 S.W.2d 706 , * * *.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jernigan v. Jernigan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.