Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 Tex. 256 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1999

4 state decisions

2019591960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Maud, Tax Collector v. Terrell, Comptroller · State v. WALKER-TEXAS INVESTMENT COMPANY

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the holding of this Court in Maud v. Terrell, 109 Tex. 97 , 200 S.W. 375 , it is clear that when the Legislature creates a new or additional cause of action in favor of the State it may also constitutionally authorize the Attorney General to prosecute such cause of action in both the trial and appellate courts of the State.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.