Gregory v. Van Ee’s Empirical Analysis
160 U.S. 643 · 1896
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1985 · most notably Albert Shulthis v. D a McDougal (1912), Arkadelphia Milling Co v. St Louis Southwestern Ry Co Hasty (1919)
5 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from First Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Relies on Rouse v. Letcher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Manifestly, the decree in the main suit cannot be revised through an appeal from a decree on ancillary or supplemental proceedings, thus accomplishing indirectly what could not be done directly.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McGraw v. Mott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.