O'Donnell v. Shaffer’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co. · United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. · Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Ruckelshaus · International Harvester Co. v. Ruckelshaus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(t)he goal is rather to insure that administrators provide a 'framework for principled decision-making' a framework that is appropriate for the issue at hand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“basic considerations of fairness may dictate procedural requirements not specified by Congress . . . ,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the presence of technical issues in and of itself (does not) create a need for cross-examination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.