James v. Haymes’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2018
2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coleman v. MacLennan · Burt v. Advertiser Newspaper Co. · Bearce v. Bass · Williams Printing Co. v. Saunders · Ramsay v. Harrison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that he was then doing slow work, that the road in 1930 was closed because of his slow work, that as a road contractor he employed dilatory tactics, and the implication was that he was doing this for the purpose of securing greater profit than he was legally entitled to.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chapin v. Knight-Ridder · Chapin“a common right of every citizen to comment upon or criticize a matter of public concern.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chapin v. Knight-Ridder · Chapin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.