In Re Bushey-Combs’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2024
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In Re Johnston · Piche v. Department of Taxes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the legislature intended to allow the Board to make determinations beyond those allowed by review of [DCF's] record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re RH“if the Board were limited to determining only whether [DCF] had sufficient evidence to support its conclusions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re RH“significantly different in nature from those of an adjudicative body.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re RH
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.