Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 Vt. 547 - State v. Lockwood

State v. Lockwood’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
4
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

1 district · 60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably State v. Baca (2004), Stevens v. Stearns (2003)

1 district · 60 state decisions

2201993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. United States · Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · Drope v. Missouri · Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. Doe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f a probation term provides for warrantless searches and the terms of probation are narrowly tailored to fit the circumstances of the individual probationer, the ... 'reasonable grounds' standard strikes the proper balance between probationer privacy rights and public protection concerns.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “That the people have a right to hold themselves, their houses, papers, and possessions, free from search or seizure; and therefore warrants, without oath or affirmation ... ought not to be granted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. In Re JM

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.