State v. Thiefault’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Shepard v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“repeatedly . . . held that Apprendi and its progeny do not require the State to submit a defendant's prior convictions to a jury and prove them beyond a reasonable doubt.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]n making such a determination, [to] rely on only those facts that Thiefault stipulated or admitted to or those that were proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Foster
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.