Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 WASH2D 454 - State v. Chenoweth

State v. Chenoweth’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Franks v. Delaware · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Johnson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`focus is on whether the unique characteristics of the state constitutional provision and its prior interpretations actually compel a particular result.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[n]o person shall be disturbed in his private affairs, or his home invaded, without authority of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “constitutionally mandated, exist[ing] primarily to vindicate personal privacy rights,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.