State v. George’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on Tibbs v. Florida · Green v. United States · United States v. Jorn · United States v. DiFrancesco · Serfass v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n act must be construed as a whole, considering all provisions in relation to one another and harmonizing all rather than rendering any superfluous.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“does not, by its plain language, require the State to demonstrate that it exercised good faith and due diligence in attempting to procure the defendant's presence at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. ROOKHUYZEN
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.