Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 W. Va. 19 - State v. Williams

160 W. Va. 19 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2005

19 state decisions

1601976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sheppard v. Maxwell · Estes v. Texas · Holt v. United States · Marshall v. United States · United States v. Armocida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A trial court must inquire beyond a simple and direct questioning of a juror as to whether he can decide a case fairly and impartially after having read news articles related to the trial of a case. Specific questions should be asked in order to determine whether a juror, even without his own knowledge, may be biased or prejudiced.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In many instances, jurors may not be sufficient judges of their own bias when they have been exposed to extrajudicial material during the trial of a case. Thus, this Court has previously stated that specific questions should be asked in order to determine whether a juror, even without his own knowledge, may be biased or prejudiced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““If it is determined that material disseminated during trial raises serious questions of possible prejudice, the court may on its own motion or shall on motion of either party question each juror, out of the presence of the others, about his exposure to that material.” [Emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.