¶1Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, for error in excluding questions addressed to the witness Sarah Tint upon cross-examination at folios 54, 59, 60, 65, 66, and those addressed to defendant at folios 90, 96, 127, 128. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
161 A.D. 888
Fishlowitz v. Tint
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 1914
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1914-01-15
Decided 1914-01-15