Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

161 Ala. 74

Mosely v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 20, 1909

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1909-05-20

Heard before Hon. I. B. Slaughter. Ivey Mosely was convicted of playing at a game of cards, etc., in his own home, at a public place, and he appeals. Under the facts in this case, the defendant should have been discharged.— Franklin v. The State, 91 Ala. 23; Lee v. The State, 136 Ala.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1969

1 state decisions

Relies on Franklin v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed and remanded · Decided 1909-05-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ANDERSON, J.

¶1The defendant was indicted under section 4792 of thé Code of 1896 (section 6983 of the Code of 1907). The only question presented is whether or not the playing was so near the public road that parties in or traveling the same could see and tell that they were playing cards. It is not sufficient that the players were seen and could be recognized; but could persons in the road see them playing cards? Franklin v. State, 91 Ala. 23, 8 South. 678.

¶2The state not only failed to prove that they were or could be seen playing cards, but both of its witnesses *75testified that they were looking at the defendant and his companions and could not tell what they were doing. The defendant was in his own house, and was not guilty unless the playing was or could be seen from the public road, and the state’s witnesses were looking and could not see them playing. The trial court erred in not discharging the defendant, and the judgment of the county court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

¶3Reversed and remanded.

Dowdell, C. J., and Simpson, and Mayfield, JJ., concur.
/161/ala/74 · .json · Public domain