In Re Lancaster’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Johnson v. Home State Bank · Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. Davenport · Kokoszka v. Belford · Toibb v. Radloff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The mere fact that a debtor's taxes are paid from his wages does not mean that the monies which may be due as a refund retain their identification as wages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.