In Re Marriott’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1202 · 11 U.S.C. § 1208 · 11 U.S.C. § 1222 · 11 U.S.C. § 1225 · 11 U.S.C. § 1226 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 28 U.S.C. § 586 (§ 224 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (Title 11))
Relies on United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · Rake v. Wade · Foster v. Heitkamp · Aberegg 13 Mishler · Fulkrod v. Savage
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“divergent judicial interpretations evidence a certain ambiguity in statutory provisions relating to the payment of claims under a Chapter 12 plan”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.