Passe v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2021
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sprott v. Roberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party may amend his pleading onee as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is filed or, if the pleading is one to which no responsive pleading is permitted and the action has not been placed upon the trial calendar, he may so amend it any time within twenty days after it is filed. Otherwise, a party may amend his pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party; and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Richard SCHADEN MCE-DIA, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company Midfield Concessions Enterprises, Inc. a Michigan limited liability company Andrea Hachem Noureddine "Dean" Hachem Samir Mashni Simrae Solutions LLC, a Colorado limited liability company Sudan I. Muhammad Pangea Concessions Group LLC, a Florida limited liability company Niven Patel and Rohit Patel v. DIA BREWING CO., LLC, a Colorado limited liability company · Doe v. Heitler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.