Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 CONN 166 - In re Marsching

In re Marsching’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
April 1985
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on James Edwards, Jr. v. State of South Carolina · Brown v. Cato · In Re Application of Dodd · In Re Application of Plantamura

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[He] engaged in the practice of law on a full-time basis in the city of New York from 1955 until 1967 as an associate of a large and well-known law firm. During the last six years of his practice in New York the applicant advised and assisted clients of the law firm on the merits, strategy and conduct of the defense or suit and on settlement, had responsibility for the direction of litigation, worked on briefs and questions of law and participated in settlement discussions. The litigation department of the law firm, however, took care of the actual courtroom work and the applicant did not physically appear in the courtroom or personally try or argue a case or motion therein.” 161 Conn. at 167-68 , 286 A.2d at 307 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.