Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 F.1d 237 - In re Schatz

In re Schatz’s Empirical Analysis

161 F. 237 · 1908

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
January 1916
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on In re O'Dea

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““And the clerk shall, if the applicant requests it, issue a subpoena for the witnesses so named by the said applicant to appear upon the day set for the final hearing, hut in case such witnesses cannot be produced upon the final hearing other witnesses may bo summoned.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Tlie petition shall also be verified by the affidavits of at least two credible witnesses, who are citizens of the United States, and who shall state in their affidavits,” etc. (the facts as to five years’ residence, moral character, etc.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.