Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 F.1d 578 - Lichtenstein v. Phipps

Lichtenstein v. Phipps’s Empirical Analysis

161 F. 578 · 1908

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
February 1909
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Dunlap v. Schofield · Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Condit Electrical Mfg. Co. · Smith v. Stewart · Pirkl v. Smith · Gimbel v. Hogg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When, from the character of the article this [affixing on the article] cannot be done by affixing to it, or to the package wherein one or more of them Is enclosed, a label containing a like notice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.