Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 F.2d 19 - United States v. Janitz

United States v. Janitz’s Empirical Analysis

161 F.2d 19 · 1947

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 1973
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1973 · most notably Carroll v. United States (1957), Auten v. Auten (1954)

36 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

2501947195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on David v. David · United States v. Rosenwasser · Lagow v. United States · United States v. Janitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think it is clear from the recital of the facts already set out that the learned Judge’s order of dismissal was not based on any objection brought against the indictment at all. The defendants had made no attack on the indictment. The Government’s case failed because it had no testimony to support it. We think this is not the kind of a judgment to which the Criminal Appeals statute is directed.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.