Cryns v. Musher’s Empirical Analysis
161 F.2d 217 · 1947
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2015
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 31
Relies on Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co. · Chapman v. Wintroath · Thompson v. Hamilton · In re Lowry · Phelan v. Green
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No amendment for the first time presenting or asserting a claim which is the same as, or for substantially the same subject matter as, a claim of an issued patent may be made in any application unless such amendment is filed within one year from the date on which said patent was granted. [Emphasis added.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Corbett v. Chisholm
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.