Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 F.2d 232 - In re Rodman

In re Rodman’s Empirical Analysis

161 F.2d 232 · 1947

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
February 1953
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on In re Wagenhorst · In re Boyce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “although the structure, as called for by the appealed claims, differs from the structures disclosed in the references, we think it would be obvious for one skilled in the art, with the reference patents before him, to modify the references in the manner called for by the appealed claims, without the exercise of invention.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.