Bereslavsky v. Caffey’s Empirical Analysis
161 F.2d 499 · 1947
Citation profile
53 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 82 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2010 · most notably Beacon Theaters Inc v. C Westover (1959), Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan (1950)
53 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 377
Relies on In Re Peterson · Ex parte Republic of Peru · Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance · United States v. United States · Clark Ex'X v. Wooster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[tjhere can be no doubt of our power in such a case to issue a writ of mandamus, as it is in aid of our jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.