United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
161 F.3d 24 · 1998
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3551 (Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3661 (Drug and Alcohol Dependent Offenders Treatment Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Koon v. United States · Bailey v. United States · United States v. Tucker · McMillan v. Pennsylvania · United States v. Watts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“four-year time interval makes the temporal factor weak, and in many cases might be difficult for another factor to outweigh,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] district court's application of the Guidelines to the facts must be given `due deference....'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] 'course of conduct' is not a limitless concept, and the limits are approached in this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.